#1  
Old 12-16-2006, 06:44 PM
carioca's Avatar
Journeyman
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Charlotte Bay, Australia
Posts: 259
Default A question of geometry...

Hello there!

I'm not much good at the abstract, so I laid out a sample 'section' of my planned 1 m ID dome oven on our verandah on some plywood - to get a feel for what I'm up against :-)

My supplier, Darley Refractories in Melbourne, sells a 'kit' specifying 67 firebricks that are 230 mm long and 115 mm wide and which taper across from 75 mm to 63 mm, as well as 33 bricks that taper from 75 mm down to 57 mm cross section.

There are NO instructions available, but I was told the first ring takes whole bricks, every subsequent course is built from bricks cut in half across the length (i.e. they will all be 115 mm by 75 mm on the outside, and 63 or 57 on the inside.

So I played around with some assumptions, as shown in the attached snap (more variations at Picasa Web Albums - carioca - Forno_del_gallo ).

But I'd be happier if some sharper brain could suggest a better way to build a 1 metre inner diameter dome from the quantities and shapes of the bricks listed in the 'kit' (I have a few extras of each type, plus 20 straight 230x115x75 mm bricks, just in case).

Thanks for any input! It's still raining here, and I've got plenty of time for a series of 'dry runs' before I even start on the footings :-)

Ciao,

Carioca
Attached Thumbnails
A question of geometry...-img_0610-1.jpg  
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-16-2006, 07:29 PM
maver's Avatar
Master Builder
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Puyallup, WA
Posts: 571
Default don't drop the keystone!

That first picture doesn't work unless you "push" the sides out with mortar wedges at each joint. The keystone has to wedge in from the top. The one with the keystone made of the less aggresive taper looks ok, and no matter what you will have to shape the keystone - it shouldn't end up as just a split brick for the gap. What happens if you start with the more aggressive taper on the base instead of in the top rings? I think that would give it a low vault profile. It's interesting trying to put together how the oven was designed without the instructions. Maybe someone with the brick CAD program can play with it for you. Don't forget to consider those mortar joints in the bricks of the dome, but probably not in the oven floor.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-16-2006, 10:53 PM
carioca's Avatar
Journeyman
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Charlotte Bay, Australia
Posts: 259
Default

Hi Maver,

I'll try your suggested way with the steeper bricks in the first four rings, thanks!

I've meanwhile posted another snap to the picasa album showing how I tried a ring of STRAIGHT bricks in the top centre - I think that might work, too...

BTW: the joints are supposed to be only 1 mm but no more than 3 mm - I assume 2 mm and the dome will close up 25 mm or so sooner, i.e. the gap at the top will narrow by that much, I think!

Yes, the lack of instructions is 'challenging'! I had already worked out in my mind that the "slide-out" downward configuration for the keystone wouldn't work, that's why I tried the other ways.

Sun's out now, the geese are sleeping under a figtree outside my french door and I might amble into the shed and uncork a bottle of australian chardonnay pinot grigio (Sero, from de Bortoli)... it's nearly 6 p.m. here now.

Cheers mate, and thanks for your comments.

Ciao,

Carioca

Last edited by carioca; 12-16-2006 at 11:16 PM. Reason: adding info
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-17-2006, 06:45 AM
Marcel's Avatar
Journeyman
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Oregon
Posts: 426
Default Be sure that your dome bricks are heavy

(M) Carioca: Just in case your dome bricks are not the correct density, consider weighing one. It should be fairly heavy; between 6 and 8 Lbs. Their very light color in your thumbnail looks rather like an insulating brick. I hope that is my mis-perception.

Ciao,

Marcel
__________________
"Everything should be made as simple as possible, ...
but no simpler!" (Albert Einstein)
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-17-2006, 04:26 PM
carioca's Avatar
Journeyman
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Charlotte Bay, Australia
Posts: 259
Default

Hi Marcel,

the flatter tapered brick weighs 3930 g - it feels alright to me, particularly as both my thumb joints are suffering from all the gripping already (I crashed into a cow near home one night13 years ago, and the shock went right through the steering wheel; van was a write-off but otherwise no damage).

Cheers,

Carioca
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-17-2006, 08:20 PM
redbricknick's Avatar
Journeyman
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 271
Default

How is the cow?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-18-2006, 01:32 AM
carioca's Avatar
Journeyman
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Charlotte Bay, Australia
Posts: 259
Default Shot by the cop attending the accident...

and no, I didn't get any of the meat, and neither could the owner of the straying beast be traced - so no compo!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-18-2006, 01:42 AM
carioca's Avatar
Journeyman
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Charlotte Bay, Australia
Posts: 259
Default Tried that, but

Quote:
Originally Posted by maver View Post
...
What happens if you start with the more aggressive taper on the base instead of in the top rings? I think that would give it a low vault profile. It's interesting trying to put together how the oven was designed without the instructions...
Further to this idea: I attach a new thumbnail but I don't think this would do the trick - for a start, I only have half as many steep-taper bricks as the flatter ones...

I've consulted my son, who's doing a PhD at UCLA and may be too busy before the January exams; but he's done a good job 20 years or so ago analysing my bisected shed roof for the house and drawing up angles and a materials list :-)

Meanwhile I got the gravel and slab mesh delivered, so I'll concentrate on the footings for a moment...

Ciao,

Carioca
Attached Thumbnails
A question of geometry...-img_0619.jpg  
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-18-2006, 07:57 AM
jengineer's Avatar
Master Builder
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Garden-A, South California
Posts: 572
Default

unit conversion challenged
3930 grams = 3.9kg = 8.6 lbs
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:58 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
2006/10 Forno Bravo, LLC