web analytics
***94 lbs.*** - Forno Bravo Forum: The Wood-Fired Oven Community



Forno Bravo Forum Thread Message

Hello, Forno Bravo Community Forum Members!

The Forno Bravo team has heard the feedback in regards to the community forum. We wanted to take the time to re-enforce our commitment to a fully engaged Forum with professional moderation.

Our top priority as a company is to fix all forum errors and issues that you are experiencing. As we are swiftly working on these problems, we want to say that we highly value the Forum Bravo Community Forum and every single community forum member.

We have set up this thread so that every member can address any concerns, issues and questions about the forum. Please feel free to ask whatever you would like in regards to the forum; let us know what issues you are experiencing so we can work on resolving them as fast as possible. However, we stress that we would like constructive engagement, so please be specific about the issue you are experiencing.

Thank you for all of your patience and continued support.

Link to topic: http://www.fornobravo.com/community/...with-new-forum
See more
See less

***94 lbs.***

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ***94 lbs.***

    can anyone tell me why Portland comes in a 94 lb. bag ? Why 94, not 100 not 80 Just curious if there is any special reason ?

  • #2
    Re: ***94 lbs.***

    The info I found says that it is 1 cubic foot. Sounds like a reasonable number. Interesting question.

    Last edited by Les; 06-17-2009, 06:54 PM.
    Check out my pictures here:

    If at first you don't succeed... Skydiving isn't for you.


    • #3
      Re: ***94 lbs.***

      I think it's the amount needed to produce a cubic foot of concrete, after the needed aggregates are added. It makes mason arithmetic easier.

      It's the sort of thing that makes metric cheerleaders pull their hair out!
      My geodesic oven project: part 1, part 2


      • #4
        Re: ***94 lbs.***

        I believe Les is correct, at least what he says agrees with what my concrete books say.

        Concrete was/is mixed by volume rather than by weight thus it was easy to have recipes that could be easily duplicated. The simple 1-2-3 mix is a good example. That's one cement, two gravel and three sand. Having one cubic foot per bag made computation of mixing larger batches easy. I'm sure glad one cubic foot of cement doesn't weigh more!



        • #5
          Re: ***94 lbs.***

          maybe they should cnsider making 1/2 a cubic foot. At least a 47lb. bag would be a little easier to carry. Thanks for all the info though, I figured there was a good reason, just thouht it was an odd weight...


          • #6
            Re: ***94 lbs.***

            I think you have your mix formula incorrect!
            Over here we have 20kg bags of cement rather than the larger (pre metric) 94 lb bags and are a lot easier to handle.
            Incidentally, 94 lb bags are 24 to the ton, or one pallete!
            Our mixes as printed on every bag are:
            Cement: sand: Aggregate or 20kg bags/ cubic metre
            Structural cement 1 : 2 : 3 or 20 20kg bags/ cubic metre
            Paving 1 : 2.5 : 3.5 or 16 20kg bags/ cubic metre
            Render 1 : 4 : - or 24 20kg bags/ cubic metre
            Mortar 1 : 6 : +1 lime or 12 20kg bags/ cubic metre

            Last edited by Rastys; 06-18-2009, 04:03 AM.
            If you don't succeed the first time, try again and again until you get it right!


            • #7
              Re: ***94 lbs.***

              Good catch Rastys! I transposed the sand and gravel. I should have written: 1 cement, 2 sand and 3 gravel.


              As a friend says:
              "Learn to laugh at yourself and you will never lack for amusement." --MW